Legal Opinion
Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. v. Alphonso Jackson, Acting Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 27, 2004No. 03-1235PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Gardiner, Kamya & Associates P.C. (“GKA”) appeals the decision of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Board of Contract Appeals holding that a contract modification was not enforceable to retroactively reprice past performance of certain task orders. Gardiner, Kamya, & Assoc. P.C., HUDBCA No. 00-C-104-C5 (Nov. 27, 2002). Because the board erred in concluding that the modification lacked consideration, we reverse and remand.
Background
On March 11, 1993, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and GKA entered into Contract Number DU100C000018170, an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- American Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Aviation Contractor Employees, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Night Vision Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.