Legal Opinion
City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 27, 1994No. 93-5183PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
The City of Tacoma, Washington, appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, holding that the city’s contract with the United States Air Force was valid and enforceable, and granting summary judgment for the government. 28 Fed.Cl. 637 (1993). We affirm.
Background
On November 20, 1972, the City of Tacoma, Washington, and the United States entered into Air Force Contract No. F45603-73-C-0009 by which the city agreed to provide electrical services to McChord Air Force Base. The contract initially said that the government would be charged for service at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Hills Materials Company v. Donald B. Rice, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Scott Paper Co. v. City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Aviation Contractor Employees, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Reliance Insurance Company and L.G. Lefler, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Coast Federal Bank, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Gardiner, Kamya & Associates, P.C. v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.