Legal Opinion

Gem State Lumber Co. v. Witty

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1923PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

— This action was brought by the Gem State Lumber Company, a corporation, against W. H. Witty and Annie T. Witty, his wife, T. H. Johnson, and E. H. Yogt, the latter doing business under the firm name and style of Yogt Sheet Metal Works, to foreclose a materialman’s lien. The complaint is in the usual form in such actions, as is the lien. The Wittys and Johnson separately demurred, and said demurrers being overruled, the Wittys answered, but Johnson failed to plead further, and default was entered against him. Yogt answered and cross-complained, seeking to foreclose his mechanic’s lien…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. NickersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Joost v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Steuerwald v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Colorado Iron Works v. RiekenbergIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Dayton v. Minneapolis Radiator & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. FlandroIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. L & W SUPPLY CORP. v. Chartrand Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Barlow's, Inc. v. Bannock Cleaning Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Priddy v. KERNERSVILLE LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API