Legal Opinion

Kradel v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1917No. Appeal, No. 93PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 93, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Butler Co., March T., 1914, No. 45, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Sarah Agnes Kradel v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler and °New Castle Railway Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $1,800 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 93, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Butler Co., March T., 1914, No. 45, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Sarah Agnes Kradel v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler and °New Castle Railway Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $1,800 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned, among others, were in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant and in refusing to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Feazee,

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for the death of her husband caused by- being struck by one of defendant’s *429cars. On the morning of the day of the accident Kradel left his home at Eberbart station on tbe line of defendant’s railway for Warrendale in Allegheny County, at wbicb latter place be became somewhat under tbe influence of liquor. In tbe afternoon while in that condition be boarded one of defendant’s cars at Warrendale to return home. He was obliged to change cars at Evans City and upon entering tbe car at this point banded tbe conductor twenty-five cents,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glancy v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Hamilton v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Warren v. Pittsburgh & Butler Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lammers v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Jameitis v. Wilkes-Barre Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API