Legal Opinion

Knoles v. Salazar

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1989No. 88-242PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The primary point of appeal in this case is the alleged inadequacy of a jury verdict. The facts, when viewed most favorably to appellees, as we must do, are as follows: Appellee Orange Porter Hillard authorized his farm employee, appellee Jesus Salazer, to use his pickup truck, but he instructed Salazar not to let his teenage son, appellee Anders Salazar, drive the truck. Anders Salazar had flunked his driver’s license exam at least eight times. Hillard saw Anders Salazar driving his truck on two or three occasions and told Jesus Salazar several times not to let his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Waterfield v. QuimbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Fields v. StovallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Goodwin v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Lusby v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Webb v. BoutonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Brown v. MinorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API