Legal Opinion

Alleghany Corp. v. Eakin

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 20, 1989No. IP 88-561-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STECKLER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). Defendants Harry E. Eakin, Commissioner of Indiana Department of Insurance ("Commissioner”), the St. Paul Companies, Inc. (“St. Paul”) and the St. Paul Indemnity Insurance Company (“St. Paul Indemnity”) seek dismissal under either Younger or Burford abstention. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 63 S.Ct. 1098, 87 L.Ed. 1424 (1943).

Plaintiff, Alleghany Corporation, seeks declaratory…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter Ex Rel. M.C. v. DoyleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  2. Alliance for Clean Coal v. BayhDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
  3. Union Carbide Corp. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API