Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of NC ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. N.C. Waste Awareness & Reduction Network

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 2017No. COA16-811Published

1DissentDillon, Judge

I conclude that NC WARN is not acting as a "public utility" because the solar panel system at issue is not serving "the public," but rather is designed to generate power for a single customer (the "Church") from the Church's property. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

The Public Utilities Act gives the Commission the power to supervise and control the "public utilities" in our State. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-30 (2015). A "public utility" as defined by our General Assembly is any entity which "own[s] or operate[s]" "equipment or facilities" that provide "electricity" "to or for the public for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Shepard v. Bonita Vista Properties, LPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. MacKieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. New Hope Road Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API