Legal Opinion

State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. New Hope Road Water Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The solo question for decision on this appeal is whether or not the respondents are public utilities within the meaning of GS 62-65(e) 2, which reads as follows: “The term ‘public utility,’ when used in this article, includes persons and corporations, or their lessees, trustees and receivers now or hereafter owning or operating in this State equipment or facilities for: Diverting, developing, pumping, impounding, distributing or furnishing water to or for the public for compensation.”

The Commission has no jurisdiction over these respondents unless they are public utilities within the meaning…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Richardson v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of NC ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. N.C. Waste Awareness & Reduction NetworkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Kohn v. Firsthealth of the Carolinas, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Buck Island, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. EdmistenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API