Rickke L. Green v. Dan Reynolds Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner appeals from a district court order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as an abuse of the writ under Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. 1 We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. See Thomas v. Kerby, 44 F.3d 884, 886 (10th Cir.1995). For the reasons explained below, we affirm the district court’s disposition with respect to the first six of seven grounds for relief asserted in the petition, but reverse as to the last, and remand for appropriate relief. 2
I
In 1971, petitioner, then sixteen…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. GloverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Hooker v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Edmond Leon LeopardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Boutwell v. BissonnetteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- United States v. Robert Lee GloverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.