Legal Opinion

Hoechstetter v. Pickens County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 2017No. A17A0565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

This appeal presents us with a narrow issue of law: specifically, what notice is required prior to a hearing that ultimately results in a zoning decision — in this case the grant of a conditional use permit. Under OCGA § 36-66-4 (a), notice must be given at least 15 days but not more than 45 days before the hearing. In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine whether OCGA § 36-66-4 (a) requires publication of notice of a hearing at every stage of the permitting process. The trial court concluded that the notice given prior to the planning commission’s meeting was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Cumming v. Realty Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. McClure v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Joe Ray Bonding Co., Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. City of Roswell v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Powers Ferry Civic Ass'n v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HOECHSTETTER v. PICKENS COUNTYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  2. Hoechstetter v. Pickens Cnty.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API