Legal Opinion

Hoechstetter v. Pickens Cnty.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 4, 2018No. S17G1500PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackwell, Justice.

Pursuant to the Zoning Procedures Law (ZPL), OCGA § 36-66-1 et seq., before a county or municipality makes a "zoning decision,"1 it must afford affected landowners and other interested citizens an opportunity to be heard, and to that end, it must "provide for a hearing" on the proposed zoning decision and publish notice of that hearing. See OCGA § 36-66-4 (a).2 In August 2015, Doug and Lynda Tatum applied to the Pickens County Board of Commissioners for a conditional use permit for a 75-acre parcel near Jasper. The application was referred to the Pickens County Planning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cumming v. Realty Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. City of Roswell v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Hoechstetter v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. MELISSA BERLIN v. CITY OF ATLANTA URBAN DESIGN COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API