HOECHSTETTER v. PICKENS COUNTY
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
303 Ga. 786
FINAL COPY S17G1500. HOECHSTETTER et al. v. PICKENS COUNTY et al. BLACKWELL, Justice. Pursuant to the Zoning Procedures Law (ZPL), OCGA § 36-66-1 et seq., before a county or municipality makes a “zoning decision,”1 it must afford affected landowners and other interested citizens an opportunity to be heard, and to that end, it must “provide for a hearing” on the proposed zoning decision and publish notice of that hearing. See OCGA § 36-66-4 (a).2 In August 2015, Doug 1 For purposes of the ZPL, OCGA § 36-66-3 (4) defines “zoning decision” as final legislative action by a local…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Cumming v. Realty Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- City of Roswell v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Hoechstetter v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- MELISSA BERLIN v. CITY OF ATLANTA URBAN DESIGN COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025