Legal Opinion

HOECHSTETTER v. PICKENS COUNTY

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 4, 2018No. S17G1500PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

303 Ga. 786

FINAL COPY S17G1500. HOECHSTETTER et al. v. PICKENS COUNTY et al. BLACKWELL, Justice. Pursuant to the Zoning Procedures Law (ZPL), OCGA § 36-66-1 et seq., before a county or municipality makes a “zoning decision,”1 it must afford affected landowners and other interested citizens an opportunity to be heard, and to that end, it must “provide for a hearing” on the proposed zoning decision and publish notice of that hearing. See OCGA § 36-66-4 (a).2 In August 2015, Doug 1 For purposes of the ZPL, OCGA § 36-66-3 (4) defines “zoning decision” as final legislative action by a local…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cumming v. Realty Development Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. City of Roswell v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Hoechstetter v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurtis Hoechstetter v. Pickens County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. MELISSA BERLIN v. CITY OF ATLANTA URBAN DESIGN COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API