Legal Opinion

Ingolsby v. Burnett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

In the first styled case Mary Burnett, a minor, sues by next friend, to recover damages resulting from injuries received when struck by an automobile operated by Ingolsby. In the second case her father sues for loss of services. The cases were tried together, and resulted in verdicts for $1200' and $800', respectively. The 'Court of Appeals affirmed both judgments.

The first assignment of error is as follows:

“The learned Court of Appeals erred in overruling petitioner’s first assignment of error in both cases, which assignment was as follows:
“ ‘During the-trial of these cases one of appellees’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prewitt-Spurr Manufacturing Co. v. WoodallTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  2. Lasater Lumber Co. v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
  3. Marshall v. North Branch Transfer Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Woods v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  5. Seals v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API