Legal Opinion

Prewitt-Spurr Manufacturing Co. v. Woodall

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 35 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County. —-J. A. Cartwright, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

Prank Woodall, a minor about fifteen years of age, by his next friend, brought this suit to recover damages for an injury received by him while employed in the manufactory of the plaintiff in error, resulting from the alleged negligence of his employer. There was a verdict *607and judgment for $3,700 in favor of the plaintiff below. The cause is before us by appeal in the nature of writ of error.

Many errors are assigned upon the action of the circuit judge. All of these may be pretermitted, save one, which is determinative of the case upon the present record.

During the cross-examination of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manigold v. Black River Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Iverson v. McDonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. TeeterNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Williams v. Town of MorristownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Guess v. MauryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  5. Horsford v. Carolina Glass Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API