Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Krow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1938No. 26201PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAYLESS, V. C. J.
In this case we are called upon to determine whether the party plaintiff in the court below was with right and authority to maintain suit on fidelity bonds given pursuant to the provisions of section 1, chapter 157, Session Laws 1923 (sec. 9123, O. S. 1931). Said section provides ;
“It is by this act made mandatory that all persons who are actively engaged in the state banking business in the state of Oklahoma and all active employees of any such bank shall from and after the passage and approval of this act give fidelity bonds, to the state of Oklahoma, executed by a surety…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- American Trust Co. v. ChittySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Blyth-Farco Co. v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. DukeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Clover v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Becker v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Gottsch v. IrelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Crews v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Smith v. RoedererSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.