Henkel v. Varner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
The facts of the case, as appellee contends, were that he and his family were tenants of an apartment in a building which belonged to appellant; that the bathtub faucet in the apartment was leaking and ap-pellee requested that it be repaired; that, thereupon, the janitor, acting upon instructions from the manager of the building, undertook to make 'the necessary repairs; that on the following morning appellee attempted to turn the porcelain handle of the hot-water faucet of the bathtub; the handle broke, leaving a sharp edge which cut and injured his hand. Following…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Hupp Motor Car Corporation v. WadsworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Harten v. LöfflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Galt v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Reuven Gilmore v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Francis v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Lampkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.