Legal Opinion

Sproul v. State Tax Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1963PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The constitutionality of a part of the legislative design for forest fire protection in eastern Oregon is the issue in this case. The statute attacked levies an assessment of one cent per acre on those lands in eastern Oregon which the legislature found present a special fire hazard. The fund raised by this levy is used for the payment of fire protection and suppression costs.

The trial court decided that the one-cent-per-acre levy was an exercise of the state’s taxing power. It held that it was a property tax and it was invalid because it was not assessed upon an ad valorem basis.

The statute…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Boyle v. City of BendOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Paulson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Foster's, Inc. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Automobile Club v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Frost v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Scappoose Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API