Legal Opinion
Cannaday v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 19, 1934No. 4170PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
This suit was instituted in the district court of Floyd county by appellees to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by them on account of the alleged breach by appellants of two written contracts, one for the sale of certain lots, the other for the erection of certain buildings, asserted by appel-lees to have been made and executed' at the same time and to constitute but one contract. A copy of each of said contracts they attach to their petition as a part thereof.
They alleged that on July 9, 1928, appellants owned lots 13, 14, 15, and 16 in block 85 in the town of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Gordon v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Winn v. GilmerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. GarrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Texas Employers Insurance v. McKayTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Atkins v. DoddsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. EbersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Cannaday v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.