Legal Opinion

Lewis v. School Dist. of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1985No. 1271PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHOYER, Judge:

This case is an appeal from an Order of the lower court denying Petitioner’s motion to compel arbitration by his employer.

The appellant, while in the course of his employment, was injured in an automobile accident caused by an uninsured motorist. The appellant received workmen’s compensation benefits from his employer and then demanded uninsured motorist benefits. The employer, appellee herein, denied these benefits. The appellant then filed a Petition to Compel Arbitration citing Modesta v. SEPTA, 503 Pa. 437, 469 A.2d 1019 (1983). This petition was denied and this appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Modesta v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Turner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Vann v. School District of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Roux Laboratories, Inc., and Transportation Insurance Company v. Turner, JuanitaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Roux Laboratories, Inc. v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API