Legal Opinion
Roux Laboratories, Inc. v. Turner
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 25, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-5775PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment to prevent defendant from pursuing an uninsured motorist arbitration claim against them. Pending before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth, the motion will be granted.
On or about June 3,1981, defendant Juanita Turner, while in the course of her employment by plaintiff Roux Laboratories, Inc. (“Roux”), was injured in a motor vehicle accident. As a result of this accident, defendant received benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Statute of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SternerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Roux Laboratories, Inc., and Transportation Insurance Company v. Turner, JuanitaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988