Legal Opinion

George v. City of Anacortes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1928No. 20960. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

The city of Anacortes, being desirous of improving; its municipally owned water system, adopted an ordinance which provided, among other things, that “said city shall construct a 10-inch wooden main on 20th street to connect the present 16-inch main on J avenue with the present 8-inch main on R avenue: . . . ” The cost of the projected improvement being approximately $50,000, it was decided to issue bonds to pay for the same, and an election was held to secure authority of the voters for the improvement and sale of the bonds. The notice of election and the printed ballot used read as follows:

“…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Broad v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sane Transit v. Sound TransitWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sane Transit v. Sound TransitWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. O'BYRNE v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API