Legal Opinion

Sane Transit v. Sound Transit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2004No. 73413-5PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

85 P.3d 346 (2004)

151 Wash.2d 60

SANE TRANSIT, a Washington non-profit corporation, and Mark Baerwaldt, for themselves and on behalf of taxpayers, Appellants,

v.

SOUND TRANSIT, officially known as the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.

No. 73413-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 10, 2003.

Decided March 4, 2004.

Helsell Fetterman Martin et al., Bradley H. Bagshaw, David Jurca, Connie Haslam, Seattle, for appellants.

Paul J. Lawrence, Central Puget Sound Regional Transit, Desmond Brown, Seattle, for respondent.

Sheila Marie…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Reid v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API