Legal Opinion
Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1939No. 227PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Defendants move to (1) strike the entire complaint upon the ground that it does not conform to the provisions of Rule 8, Subdiv. (e) (1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; or (2) in the alternative, to strike specific provisions thereof on the ground that they are redundant, immaterial, repetitious, unnecessary, argumentative or contain alleged evidentiary matters; and (3) for an order directing that certain defendants designated as secondary defendants be dropped from the action upon the grounds that the allegations as to them are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Catanzaritti v. BiancoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- Jacobson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Washburn v. Moorman Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Ginsberg v. ZagarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Brazee v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.