Legal Opinion

Catanzaritti v. Bianco

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1938No. 1338PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

This case is before the Court upon Defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for the reasons that the'Plaintiffs have a complete and adequate remedy at law, and that the amount in controversy is less than $3,000.

Although this action was begun as a suit in equity before the Rules of Civil Procedure were in effect, it must now be viewed as a civil action in which the Plaintiffs ask for remedies formerly obtainable only in a court of equity. Federal Rule 86, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that the Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to all pending actions…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Communications Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. Dollar v. LandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Summit Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Keiser v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Kansas City, St. L. & CR Co. v. Alton R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API