Legal Opinion

Sioux Remedy Co. v. Lindgren

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

¿\ppeal from Circuit Court, Spink County. Hon. Alva E. Taylor, Judge. Action by the -Sioux Remedy Company against Neis Lindgren. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict in favor of the defendant. The action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the sum of $8o alleged to be due for a bill of merchandise sold and delivered to defendant. To the complaint the defendant interposed an answer making the statutory denial as to' the incorporation of the plaintiff, and alleges: (I) That, if plaintiff is a corporation, it was organized and is a corporation existing under the laws of Iowa, and that plaintiff has not filed a certified copy of its articles of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Ware v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Coit & Co. v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. West v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Cullen v. SpottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Manganese Steel Safe Co. v. First State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. O'Connor v. HemeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API