Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Spotts

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1924No. File No. 5428PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note given by defendant Spotts, tenant, to plaintiff, landlord, for rent of land. Defendant Ereelove signed the note as surety. By way of counterclaim defendants allege .the making of a written lease which, is set forth; the then existence of a sufficient supply of water, the same being supplied from an artesian well on adjoining land; the failure of such water supply; the demand upon, and refusal by, plaintiff to furnish a suitable water supply; that defendant tenant has been obliged to haul water from a distance of several miles, to his damage in the sum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Rue v. McIntoshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Taylor v. White River Valley Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Independent Harvester Co. v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Sioux Remedy Co. v. LindgrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank v. WolfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers' Elevator Co. v. SwierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Allgood v. National Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. GotwalsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Kloek v. BarberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API