Legal Opinion

Curtis v. San Pedro Transportation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1935No. Civ. 9932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Respondent as plaintiff sued appellant company and one Christensen for an assault committed by Christensen on December 16, 1932. Respondent on such date was a passenger on a ferry owned by the company and operated by Christensen, its servant. The facts constituting the assault are not questioned, nor is any point raised as to the responsibility of the appellant company for the acts of its servant Christensen. The company, which is the sole appellant, contends that the judgment entered upon the verdict is invalid because it does not conform to the verdict. Appellant asserts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. People v. McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Johnson v. VisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. MorleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Woodworkers Tool Works v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. People v. FreudenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Fernandez v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API