Legal Opinion
McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-510(ESH)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
In General Telephone Co. v. Falcon,1 the Supreme Court ruled that “a Title VII class action, like any other class action, may only be certified if the trial court is satisfied, after a rigorous analysis, that the prerequisites of Rule 23[] have been satisfied.” Id. at 161, 102 S.Ct. 2364. In accordance with that admonition, the parties in this case, a proposed class action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., have submitted nearly 150 pages of pleadings and nine volumes of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Taylor v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- DeRosa v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMMUTER RAIL COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Moore v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.