Legal Opinion

DeRosa v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMMUTER RAIL COMPANY

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 17, 2010No. C.A. 07-11824-MLWPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a putative class action, brought by plaintiffs Elaine DeRosa, Joyce Washington, Pamela McBride, and Ana Oliveira, all of whom are employees or former employees of defendant Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rail Company (“MBCR”). Plaintiffs allege that Blacks and Hispanics have been discriminated against by the MBCR in its promotional process.

Plaintiffs raise claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Count I), Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, § 4 (Count II); and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Count III). They seek…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Flores v. Anjost Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  3. In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. Vargas v. Spirit Delivery & Distribution Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  5. Shanley v. CadleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API