Elmora and West End, C., Assn. v. Dancy
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The facts which give rise to the present controversy are fully set forth in a previous opinion filed by me in this cause and reported in 107 N.J. Eq. 512. Pursuant to that opinion an order was entered dismissing the petition as to all parties except the complainant and except as to Aaron Kaufman, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. The petition was retained as against the purchaser on the theory that if the foreclosure proceedings and sale proved to have been fraudulent, an innocent purchaser, although he would be protected, might be held accountable for profits arising out of a fraudulent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morris v. GlaserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Burnett v. Dunn Commission & Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Kinkead v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Mills v. HendershotNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Coe v. New Jersey Midland Railway Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schmid v. First Camden National Bank, C., Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Capabianco v. BorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969