Legal Opinion

Mills v. Hendershot

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 23, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Hoard on bill, answers and cross-bills, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, Y. C.

The receiver of an insolvent corporation files this bill against the defendants, Hendershot, Welsh and Downs, three of the fonr *260stockholders of the company, and the administrator of the only remaining stockholder, E. D. Stephens, who is deceased. Eor the purpose of 'paying the debts of the insolvent corporation, a recovery is sought upon three classes of alleged liabilities. Against the two defendants, Hendershot and the administrator of Stephens, the receiver claims the value of goods of the corporation taken by Hendershot and Stephens on a partial division of its assets made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. DummerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1824

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fricke v. AngemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Bartlett v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  4. Havey v. HofmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  5. Hinkley v. SagemillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API