Legal Opinion

Capabianco v. Bork

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 26, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

106 N.J. Super. 429 (1969)

256 A.2d 76

VITO CAPABIANCO AND JULIA CAPABIANCO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

JOHN L. BORK, JOSEPHINE M. BORK, HIS WIFE, AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 26, 1969.

Mr. Donald I. Bierman for plaintiffs (Messrs. Bierman and Bierman, attorneys, not appearing).

Mr. Frank W. Hoak for defendants (Mr. Donald B. Jones, attorney).

LANE, J.S.C.

This is an action for partition with a counterclaim for subrogation to the rights of a prior mortgagee and for strict foreclosure. The facts are not in dispute. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  2. Institute Building & Loan Ass'n v. EdwardsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  3. Camden Co. Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  4. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. CollinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Jackson Trust Co. v. GilkinsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. WalkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Big Land Investment Corp. v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. US Bank Nat. Ass'n v. HyltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API