State v. Sanchez
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion
2Per curiam
¶1 Appellant Greg Paul Sanchez appeals-the sentences imposed on two convictions of distributing,’ offering, or arranging to distribute a' controlled substance, one a first degree felony and the other a second degree felony. We affirm.
¶2 This court reviews sentencing decisions for an abuse of .discretion. See State v. Neilson, 2017 UT App 7, ¶ 15, 391 P.3d 398. A court abuses its .discretion in sentencing “when [it] fails to consider all legally relevant factors or if the sentence imposed is clearly excessive.” State v. Monzon, 2016 UT App 1, ¶ 8, 365 P.3d 1234 (alteration in…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ValdovinosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. WanosikUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MonzonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KarrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. CorryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- In re A.D-C.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Sankey v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025