State v. Hoffman
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion
2Per curiam
¶ 1 Amelia Suzanne Hoffman appeals the sentence for her conviction of attempted possession of a controlled substance, a class A misdemeanor. We affirm.
¶ 2 Hoffman argues that the district court erred by ordering her to complete twelve months of supervised probation and requiring her to complete a substance abuse evaluation and recommended treatment, as well as requiring her to comply with the other standard terms and conditions of probation. Hoffman concedes that the issue she raises on appeal was not preserved. However, she asserts that the claims may be reached either…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JaegerUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PraterUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. TelfordUtah Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017