Legal Opinion

In re VMS Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 6, 1994No. 89 C 9448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

In a final judgment order dated November 19, 1991 (“the final judgment”), this court approved a settlement agreement in this con*637solidated securities fraud class action against numerous defendants including Prudential Securities Incorporated (“Prudential”). Prudential moves to enforce the final judgment against class member Monsignor Máximos Mardelli (“Mardelli”) and class members Marilyn J. Baird (“Baird”), Freída A. Huyck (“Huyek”), Wilma S. Anderson (“Anderson”) and Anne DeSisto (“DeSisto) (collectively “the Michigan class members”).

BACKGROU…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Vms Securities Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. In re VMS Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. Langford v. DevittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. BelandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. George Hadges, William M. Kunstler v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Vandeventer v. Wabash National Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
  5. In Re McNicholsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API