Klipstein v. Klipstein
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:(1) Was there a sufficient change in the circumstances to warrant an increase in the amount of support payments to be made by the appellant; and(2) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in requiring the appellant to pay $500 for respondent’s attorney’s fees on this appeal?
Support payments.
This court has established two tests for reviewing a trial court’s modification of a divorce judgment. Chandler v. Chandler (1964), 25 Wis. 2d 587, 131 N. W. 2d 336. As stated in Foregger v. Foregger (1968), 40 Wis. 2d 632, 643, 162 N. W. 2d 553, 164 N. W. 2d 226:
“.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dees v. DeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Kritzik v. KritzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Foregger v. ForeggerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Greenlee v. GreenleeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Chandler v. ChandlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thies v. MacDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Poehnelt v. PoehneltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- In RE MARRIAGE OF BURGER v. BurgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Severson v. SeversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.