Legal Opinion

Elder v. Chapman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, to recover a partial payment on a purchase of land. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered the following opinion :

As said in appellant’s brief: “ The simple question involved in this record is whether or not the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was void as a gambling contract, by virtue of the provisions for the distribution of the lots contained in the proposed syndicate agreement annexed thereto and made á part thereof.”

The contract referred to recites the receipt by appellee from appellant of $3,000, as part payment toward the purchase of blocks 5 and 6 of a certain subdivision of land (containing ninety-six lots), bargained…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Thomas v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Lynch v. RosenthalIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Foster v. JaredIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Seidenbender v. Charles's administratorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1818

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elder v. PrussingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  2. Nolan v. HighbaughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API