McKeen v. Naughton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
Action to determine conflicting claims to certain real property.
The appellant claims title to the land in controversy by virtue of a purchase thereof at a sale under an execution issued upon a judgment of the municipal court of appeals of San Francisco in favor of one Harry Pateman, against Robert McKeen and W. H. Norton, for the sum $277.70, including costs.
The action of Pateman v. McKeen and Norton was commenced in the court of a justice of the peace for the city and county of San Francisco, and judgment therein rendered on May 8, 1879, in favor of the plaintiff therein,, and against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Coker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Dutertre v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steinhart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Robbins v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- May v. City of MilpitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Turner v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Schoonover v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.