Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 24, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-3228PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUYETT, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This court is required to address again the difficult and controversial issue of the permissible degree of governmental regulation of a woman’s abortion decision. In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiffs challenge the 1988 and 1989 amendments to Pennsylvania’s Abortion Control Act of 1982 (“the Act”), Act of March 25, 1988, 1988 Pa.Laws 262, No. 31, §§ 3-10 (“Act 31”) and Act of November 17, 1989, 1989 Pa.Laws 592, No. 64, §§ 1-9 (“Act 64”), amending 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. §§ 3201-20 (Purdon 1983 and 1990 Supp.). 1 Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Planned Parenthood Of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- EMW Women's Surgical Ctr. v. Andrew BeshearCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Planned Parenthood v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.