Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Panama Canal Co.
District Court, Canal Zone
Decided April 21, 1961No. Civ. Nos. 4784, 4797PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROWE, District Judge.
These findings are made a part of and are in addition to the opinion of the Court and are made from the Stipulation of Facts filed by counsel and from submissions of proposed findings by each party.
In accordance with this plan, the Court finds that:
1. The defendant, Panama Canal Company, is a corporate agency and instrumentality of the Government of the United States of America, created by the Panama Canal Company Act, which act constitutes article 8 of chapter 12 of title 2, Canal Zone Code, consisting of sections 245 to 258 of said title 2, enacted June 29, 1948, c.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wade v. Carter, Jr. v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Carter v. PANAMA CANAL COMPANYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- Panama Canal Company v. Spencer M. Anderson, and Arthur MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Panama Canal Company v. Spencer M. Anderson, and Arthur MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963