Legal Opinion
Carter v. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 20, 1970No. Civ. A. 1890-68PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CORCORAN, District Judge.
I
The plaintiffs are towing locomotive operators employed by the defendant Panama Canal Company in the Canal Zone'. They seek overtime pay of at least 15 minutes per day of allegedly compensable work computed in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § 5544 for all time spent performing the activity in question since Juy 29, 1965.
The defendant Panama Canal Company is a federally chartered corporation of the United States and is subject to suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 2 Canal Zone Code §§ 61(c) and 65(a) (3).
II
To…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Wade v. Carter, Jr. v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Baylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Graham v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.