Legal Opinion

People v. Reynolds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*631At the initial hearing to determine the defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]), the County Court designated the defendant a level three sex offender based on a presumptive override for a prior felony conviction of a sex crime, holding that the override resulted in a “mandatory” level three designation. On the appeal from that order, this Court reversed and remitted to the County Court for a new hearing and determination, affording the defendant an opportunity to present mitigating circumstances in support of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. WindhamNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. BoykinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. SconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API