Legal Opinion

Tevita Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1970No. 24446_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner came to the United States in 1968 at age 36 as a student. He did not register for or attend school but instead began to work in violation of his student status. On December 11, 1963, he was directed to leave the United States. Since that date the Immigration and Naturalization Service has been attempting to accomplish that result.

In Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (9 Cir., 1968) 397 F.2d 196, we considered the case in detail. The special inquiry officer had found petitioner ineligible for adjustment of status under § 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tevita Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Nai Cheng Chen and Yuan Jung Chen v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. TALANOABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969
  4. AHMADBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  5. Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API