TALANOA
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision *1945 MATTER OF TALANOA* In Deportation Proceedings • A-13550300 Decided by Board March 11, 1969 (1) Respondent's motion for reconsideration of the denial of 'hie section 245 adjustment of status application contending that a supervening event, namely, the amendment of section 212(a) (14) of the Immigration and Na- tionality Act by the Act of October 3, 1965 to require a labor certification, should not bar his adjustment at an earlier date (May 1985) when a visa was available, is denied since the case has been before the court on judi- cial review, the issue could have been raised…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stellas v. EsperdySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Tevita Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Angela Maria Pierno v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Tevita Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ramirez-Canales v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Margaret J. Randall v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Margaret J. Randall v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Ramirez-Canales v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008