Legal Opinion

AHMAD

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1974No. ID 2316PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2316 MATTER OF AHMAD In Deportation Proceedings A-13323205 Decided by Board August 23, 1974 To qualify for the investor exemption from the labor certification requirement of section 212(a)(14) of the Act, the respondent must, pursuant to 8 CFR 212.8(bX4), establish that he is an investor who has invested, or is actively in the process of investing capital totaling at least $10,000. That portion of the investment concerning the kves- tory in a gasoline station business can only be considered as the value of the inventory on hand at a given time, plus prepaid orders not yet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. HEITLANDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  2. KOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
  3. Tevita Talanoa v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. LAUBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  5. TALANOABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CHIANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  2. EwelineB Fashion, LLC v. CissnaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  3. YARDENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API