Legal Opinion

Lombardi v. Whitman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 19, 2007No. 73PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

485 F.3d 73

John LOMBARDI, Roberto Ramos Jr., Hasan A. Muhammad, Rafael A. Garcia and Thomas E. Carlstrom, individually and as representatives of a class of individuals similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Christine T. WHITMAN, in her individual capacity, James L. Connaughton, in his individual capacity, Eileen McGinnis, in her individual capacity, William J. Muszynski, in his individual capacity, John L. Henshaw, in his individual capacity, Samuel Thernstrom, in his individual capacity, and John Does, 1-10, in their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 06-1077-cv.

Unite…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Charles v. Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Arar v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Benzman v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Mara v. RillingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. Demartino v. New York State Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API