Legal Opinion
Charles v. Orange County
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 24, 2019No. 17-3506-pr; August Term, 2018PublishedCited by 406 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge:
*77 The question before us is whether the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Michelet Charles and Carol Small, have stated a plausible claim for relief under the Fourteenth Amendment for deliberate indifference to their serious medical needs. Plaintiffs were confined for many months as civil immigration detainees at the Orange County Correctional Facility, where they received treatment for their serious mental health disorders. Defendants-Appellees are Orange County, the municipality that oversees the Orange County Correctional Facility ("the Jail"); the Orange County…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by406 opinions
- Velasco Lopez v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- E. D. v. Daniel SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Darby v. GreenmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Sheri Trozzi v. Lake County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
401 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.