Legal Opinion
Williams v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 1982No. 82-5181PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
James Williams appeals from an order preliminarily enjoining him from using a numbering system for replacement parts for the J-65 jet engine consisting of the part number selected by Curtiss-Wright Corporation, the manufacturer of the J-65 engine, prefixed by the letter G. The numbering system was proposed by Williams following the affirmance by this court of a preliminary injunction prohibiting him from using trade secrets of Curtiss-Wright.1 Curtiss-Wright contends that the numbering system inadequately complies with that injunction, and also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Keebler Company v. Rovira Biscuit Corporation, Keebler Company v. Rovira Biscuit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Sk&f, Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Paul Smith, an Individual v. Edward L. Montoro and Film Ventures International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Rosenfeld v. W.B. SaundersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- American Greetings Corp. v. Dan-Dee Imports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Ford Motor Co. v. B & H SUPPLY, INC.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.