Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. B & H SUPPLY, INC.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 28, 1986No. Civ. 3-85-865PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ford Motor Company (Ford) commenced this action against the various defendants on June 26, 1984, alleging claims of copyright infringement (Count I), trademark infringement and unfair competition (Count II), and racketeering and corrupt practices (Count III). Contemporaneous with filing its Complaint, Ford sought a Temporary Restraining Order and an Order for Seizure. In an Order dated June 26, 1984, Judge Harry H. MacLaughlin issued a Temporary Restraining Order, restraining the several defendants from using Ford’s copyrighted package designs…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Gershwin Publishing Corporation v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., and Community Concerts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Liquid Air Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Carolyn N. McCulloch Lucyann W. Cameron, Elizabeth P. Smoot, the Original Red Plate Company v. Albert E. Price, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.