Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Williams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2002No. 01-0231PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

Seymour Williams, a former employee with Union Pacific Railroad Company, brought a Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) claim against Union Pacific based on an injury Williams suffered at a train derailment site. See 45 U.S.C. § 51. The issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to submit Union Pacific’s proposed foreseeability instruction in the jury charge. The jury held for Williams, and the trial court rendered judgment on the verdict. The court of appeals affirmed and held that the trial court properly refused Union Pacific’s proposed instruction because it confused…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P. v. HawleyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of the Colony v. North Texas Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API